It is no use getting up races if
men won't enter them. Many men plead the foolish reason for not entering that
they cannot win. Is winning the sole incentive? I think not.
There
is pleasure, there is experience, there are a hundred things to compensate the
man who goes in like a sailor and a sport, and takes his boat over the course,
win or lose. This is especially so in the long races over unfamiliar water, to
new ports, where you meet and make new friends.
Besides, do you owe nothing to the sport, or the club, or to your
comrades, or to the stranger who comes to race under your flag? He at least
should be given an opportunity to show what he can do against the best of your
fleet . . .
One way to get more entries is to give every finisher something to show
that he has been in the race. The best thing is a small bronze plate to screw
up in his cabin. These can be had for a small sum, and are greatly appreciated,
as they are an ever-present excuse for a yarn and a drink.
Also, more prizes should be offered; if seven start, at least three
prizes should be given, not necessarily expensive ones, but something. A prize
is a prize, no matter whether, second, or third.
It's extraordinary that Mr. Day should have anticipated my complaint 100
years before I complained. Perhaps he was what they call prescient; or perhaps
sailboat skippers have always been the same.
I have certainly known men who completely destroyed local one-design racing
classes because they just kept winning and nobody else ever stood a real chance
of walking away with the top trophy. The perpetual losers just got thoroughly
discouraged, sold their boats, and went looking for another class where they
had a better chance; or else they bought boats that could be raced under rules
like the CCA or IOR or PHRF, where a small bribe for the measurer might assure
one of a more favorable handicap.
The message is quite plain. Even if winning is not the sole incentive, it
is a mighty powerful encouragement to
keep racing, and if you wish to promote a healthy competitive class you must
convince the perpetual winners to throw races occasionally, pour encourager les autres. Just let
them win a few minor races, and then suddenly astonish them with your skill and
expertise in the season's major final regatta. Yes, yes, I know it's sneaky,
but it's for their own good, really.
Today's
Thought
Virtue and cunning were endowments greater
Than nobleness and riches: careless heirsMay the two latter darken and expend;
But immortality attends the former,
Making a man a god.
— Shakespeare, Pericles.
Tailpiece
“My wife has
been using one of those flesh-reducing rollers for nearly six weeks now.”“Oh yeah? Has she had any results?”
“Yes, the roller is much thinner.”
(Drop by
every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for a new Mainly about Boats column.)
2 comments:
Just my 2 cents, and I may be way off base, but I think that any organizer who is in danger of losing all his or her entrants because some one person is taking all the prizes should consider changing the courses around.
De-emphasizing the upwind legs (or ditching them entirely) lessens (or completely removes) a lot of the frustration for less technical sailors.
Pounding upwind while chasing puffs is dreary work for all but the truly obsessed. And it warps yacht design.
Hey Aaron,
AFAIK, all races start with an upwind leg. After that it's either downwind or reaching, or one than the other in the case of the Olympics. Heck even our local "race your house" event, the least serious race in the nation, has an upwind leg.
Still, I take your point about slogging up when you really just feel like cruising in the same direction as a bunch of other boats :)
Post a Comment