I happened
on this fact in an article written in 1940 by Richard Maury, who blamed it on
the rigors to which they were exposed.
“They were frantically bullied,” said Maury, “and, with all due respect
to their masters, were beaten to death — as an old-timer might say — so much so
that, after half a dozen voyages, they were usually in need of rebuilding.”
They were
worked so hard, apparently, that “they were strained and buckled out of shape
to reach the pots of gold in California and Australia. They were severely
worked and their backs were broken until they had to be held in shape with
chains secured around their side.”
Clippers
were old ships in five years, and by the time they reached 10 they were no
longer greyhounds but more like tortoises.
The very mania for speed that brought their beauty into existence turned
out to be their death knell.
Chains
around their sides, indeed. What an ignoble end for such elegant ships, surely some
of the loveliest creations mankind was ever responsible for.
Today’s Thought
Allow time and moderate delay; haste manages
all things badly.— Statius, Thebais
Tailpiece
(Drop by
every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for a new Mainly about Boats column.)
1 comment:
One would imagine there is a limit to what can be built using specific materials, and clipper ships may have found the limit for wood. The stresses on a large loaded hull in a seaway must be enormous and the scantlings and fastenings become too large. One wouldn't expect to see a supertanker made in the same way Thor Heyerdahl or Tim Severin constructed their vessels !
Post a Comment