WE DON’T OFTEN talk about heads
around here, but Harrison Butler did. Quite a lot.
T. Harrison Butler was the famous
British naval architect perhaps best known for his metacentric theory of yacht
design. But in his 1945 book, Cruising
Yachts, he also includes a delightful passage about toilet arrangements on
small boats, which he refers to in his delicate way as "sanitary
accommodation." Here's what he had
to say:
"This is a most important
question which, perhaps for reasons of modesty, is generally most inadequately
dealt with. Accommodation is necessary
even in small day-boats . . .
"I am inclined to think that
the ability to lodge the sanitation in the forecastle, apart from the main
cabin, decides what must be the smallest size of a cruising yacht. I am utterly opposed to a separate
compartment in any yacht under about 12 tons.
"In the first place, it is
absurd to sacrifice two-and-a-half feet of valuable space in the best part of
the hull for functions which are limited to a few minutes a day; in the second place, these small
compartments, ill-ventilated, smelly and difficult to clean, have no advantages
from the standpoint of privacy. A mere thickness of wood does not comprise
seclusion, and for all practical purposes of concealment, apart from the visual,
might not be there.
"Now, if the sanitation is
lodged in the forecastle, there is considerable secrecy, for one can enter the
forecastle from the saloon for a variety of purposes. Never forget that that,
even when anchored head to wind, the current of air is from the stern forwards,
and with an open forehatch the use of the convenience is attended with no
unpleasantness.
"Again, these contrivances have
to be used at sea, when there may be a considerable motion. An arrangement
that, with skilled acrobatics, can be made to function in harbour may be quite
useless at sea. With a mixed crew of four, I have never, either in Vindilis or
Sandook, found the forecastle lavatory any detriment, except once or twice at
night. Under these circumstances, a bucket in the cockpit has sufficed.
"The under-water machines [1]
are not suitable for a very small craft; they are too heavy and too high. Nearly three feet sitting room must be
allowed, but part of it can be gained by utilizing the extra height given by
the forehatch. In such craft, a bucket will be used. The compartment in which
the bucket stands ought to be lined with lead or other metal, otherwise in time
there will be a chronic smell, for with a wood lining adequate cleansing is
impossible."
The bucket-and-chuck-it toilet
system that Harrison Butler aadvocated is now illegal in U.S. coastal waters,
of course. You have to be several miles
away from the land before you can do that.
We now have to pump our waste into holding tanks or else install Porta
Pottis. Either way, it's pretty disgusting to have to carry your sewage around
with you, but it's a penalty we have to accept in the name of creating a
greener earth; although I have to admit
it makes me quite mad when I pass a whale, and think of the massive amounts of
effluent he and his pals dump into the water, apparently without upsetting Nature in any way.
[1] I presume he means the old fixed
toilets, flushed with sea water, that discharged directly through the hull into
the surrounding water. —JV
Today's
Thought
Out
of the world's way, out of the light,
Out
of the ages of worldly weather,
Forgotten
of all men altogether.
— Swinburne, The Triumph of Time
Tailpiece
"How's your new computer system
working?"
"It's wonderful. Works like a
charm."
"Great. And how's
business?"
"Dunno. We had to close down
the business to run the computer system."
(Drop by every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for a
new Mainly about Boats column.)
1 comment:
No thoughts on composting toilets? From what I read, it is just separation of wet (1) and dry(2), with constant air movement to dry any moisture in the "dry"(2), and some added inert dry mix with after use and agitation. The wet can go overboard, most anywhere, at any time, from what I understand. I don't know if anyone will arrest you for "peeing" overboard - anywhere; It's likely an indecent exposure charge, if anyone cares at all, even in a marina.
I don't actually know, but wouldn't it be great to free up that poop tank area for food/beer/sail storage?
I'm just curious how much more disgusting the 5 gallons of "dry" poop can be, compared to the 40 gallons of sloshing "suck-out"?
Post a Comment