EVERY
NOW AND THEN somebody new to sailing will try to assure me that catamarans are
the latest, fastest things in the yachting world. Now, I don’t know much about
multihulls, not half as much as I probably should, but I do know that’s wrong
with that statement. Multihulls have been around an awfully long time.
My
own experience with reasonably large cats is limited to a Caribbean cruise I
did from Grenada years ago on assignment for Cruising World magazine. She was a 38-foot Lagoon, and wonderfully
luxurious compared with anything I’ve ever owned; but I wasn’t much taken with
her performance under sail.
I
readily admit I am biased. I grew up with small monohulls and I like the way
they feel, the way they can tack on a dime, the way they respond to the helm
when your jib starts telling you you’re pointing too high. In half a second the
jib is quiet again and doing the work it is paid to do. I didn’t get that
feeling on the Lagoon, which responded much more slowly.
I
also found it very strange that when a sudden gust came along, the Lagoon would
simply sprint forward and not heel. Heeling is one of the parameters I use to
judge when spilling wind, or reefing, is necessary. I get a very uneasy feeling
when that parameter is removed.
And
I guess I was put off multihulls at an early age when I learned that they were
building escape hatches in the bottom of the boats as a matter of course, so
you could scramble out and wave your arms for help when you capsized.
As
for racing cats, it was way back in 1870s that Nat Herreshoff designed, built,
and raced a catamaran called Amaryllis.
She easily won the second race of the 1876 Centennial Series against some of
the fastest boats in the country. She had at least one of the faults still
causing trouble for today’s multihulls, though. In June, 1877, Amaryllis drove her bows under at high
speed, and pitchpoled during a match race.
Monohulls
do that sometimes, too, of course, but perhaps not as often. And in any case an
outside-ballasted monohull will tend to right herself promptly, whereas a
multihull is more stable upside down than she is the right way up.
The
multihull’s advantage is that, lacking the heavy keel, she will float until the
seacows come home, or at least at until some keen-eyed rescuer comes along. I
personally wouldn’t like to try living in or on an inverted multihull. I was
very glad I didn’t capsize the Lagoon, though I suppose Cruising World would have missed me after a few weeks and sent out
the search-and-rescue troops. That’s what I like to think, anyhow — though I
may be sadly misguided.
Today’s Thought
For the actual sailing, I
enjoyed these craft [catamarans] more than any I ever owned.
—
Nathanael C. Herreshoff
Tailpiece
“Hey
I just realized why I keep winning at poker and losing on the horses.”
“So
why is it?”
“They
won’t let me shuffle the horses.”
(Drop
by every Monday, Wednesday, Friday for a new Mainly about Boats column.)
No comments:
Post a Comment