A READER in Anchorage,
Alaska, who calls himself or herself “Iceberg” asks if I could repeat a column
I recently wrote about balance in sailboats. Well, I don’t remember writing
about that subject recently, but I did write about it many years ago. So here’s
hoping that this is what you’re after, Iceberg:
THERE ARE MANY DESIGN
FAULTS that sailboat owners will admit to, but unseaworthiness is not one of
them. A skipper might well shrug off a lack of accommodation. He or she might
well agree the boat is slow, or hard on the helm. But nobody wants to own an unseaworthy
boat.
Seaworthiness is the happy
result of a lot of factors but there is one that is often overlooked. It’s
called balance.
According to Tony Marchaj,
a sailor, pilot, naval architect, and research scientist, “Almost by
definition, seaworthiness cannot be achieved if the boat is badly balanced.”
So what do we mean by
balance? That question was answered by a famous British designer, J. Laurent
Giles. He said good balance is “freedom from objectionable tendencies to gripe
or fall off the wind, regardless of angle of heel, speed or direction of wind.”
He added that a well
balanced boat had an easy motion in a seaway, that is, she passed easily over
the waves, neither tending to plunge the bow deeply into the next wave ahead,
nor throwing her nose high in the air as a wave passed the fore body. She would
also unfailingly lift her stern to a following sea.
“One requires of the
balanced yacht that she should retain the utmost docility and sureness of
movement in manoeuvering at sea, in good or bad weather,” he added. “She must
maintain a steady course when left to herself, but must be instantly responsive
to her helm so that the heavier seas may be dodged if circumstances permit. She
must be capable of being left to her own devices, sailing, hove-to, or under
bare poles.”
That sounds like a very
tall order to me. What sort of hull has this wondrous quality of balance?
Here’s Marchaj again:
“In a narrower sense, this
means that the inherently balanced hull does not substantially alter its
longitudinal trim, and does not alter its course during the process of heeling
and rolling.” In other words, to be well balanced, a hull, when heeled, should
immerse about the same volume of topsides forward and aft.
Marchaj points out that
many of the good old boats still sailing now were either designed for, or
affected by, the old International Offshore Rule, which produced shallow, beamy
hulls with pinched bows. “Usually, when they heel, the stern is lifted and the
bow falls. Consequently, these boats are difficult to control by rudder and are
unseaworthy.”
If the bow digs in as the
boat heels, a boat will try to round up into the wind, of course, not only
because of the wedge effect of the forward sections but also because the center
of lateral resistance has moved forward while, at the same time, the center of
effort of the sails has moved outward and gains more leverage. This is when the
person at the helm suddenly finds the tiller up under his chin. Not that it
does much good if the boat heels too far and the rudder comes out of the water.
Luckily, most of us don’t
often sail in sea conditions that challenge the full seaworthiness of our
boats. But if you should be of a mind to cross an ocean or sail around Cape
Horn, balance might be a good thing to keep in mind as you search for the right
boat.
Today’s Thought
Everything splendid is
rare, and nothing is harder to find than perfection.
— Cicero
Tailpiece
“Are you allowed to smoke
at school?”
“No.”
“Are you allowed to drink
at school?”
“Of course not.”
“How about dates?”
“Oh, dates are fine, as
long as you don’t eat too many.”
5 comments:
I think a boat with a motor well for an outboard should never leave sight of land. Speaking from experience.
I had a S&S Yankee Dolphin 24 with a motor well and sailed her 50 plus miles offshore many times. These boats crossed oceans...so I fail to understand how your experience applies to all boats with motor wells.
I have to agree with biglilwave. Cal 20s have outboard wells in the cockpit, and several have crossed the Pacific from San Francisco to Hawaii.
What was your experience, Allan S?
John V.
My experience, and remember it's my experience. We were in our Coronado 25 on the Western edge of Lake Ontario sailing between Hamilton and St. Catharines Ontario when "it" happened. We got pooped. As pooped goes, I thought it was pretty bad but then again, I had never experienced a poop before (we are talking the wave breaking on the stern of the boat and not the biological function just for clarification).
The force of the wave blew the engine hatch cover open, leaving it dangling by one broken hinge. The worst was the mighty 9.9 Evinrude, it was also forced off its mount, held in place by it being diagonal to its original and natural position.
I get the wife to take the tiller, neglecting to change course, (that is an important misstep on my part), rip what remains of the engine cover off and begin a rescue operation of the outboard.
No soon as I have braced myself, clasped the outboard in my hands and begin twisting it to free it, than we get pooped again.
Remember those movie scenes of a rocky shore where the waves break and shoot up like a geyser through a hole in the rock formation? Well, the engine well was that rock formation! I pert near drowned, the geyser shot up like three feet. That may not seem like much to you, but when the next poop happened I just finished draining my lungs and averted my head and politely asked my wife to alter course a touch, (and yes, we are still married).
Managed to get the engine back in place. So there. There were some modification to a few things after that.
BTW, that Coronado 25 was a wonderful boat, but we sold that and bought a 38 footer with a full keel which comes with its own stories...lol
A frightening and chastening experience, Allan. I hadn't thought of that happening. The Cal 20's motor well just goes straight down through the cockpit floor well forward of the transom, so your kind of "blow-out" isn't so likely to happen. Glad to see you're still married, though. You obviously kept your cool.
Cheers,
John V.
Post a Comment