WHEN
PEOPLE ASK ME how to write a best-seller, I usually point them at E. Annie
Proulx, who won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction in 1994 for her novel The Shipping News.
This
book deals with the two subjects I know best, boats and newspapers. Here’s what
I learned from E. Annie:
First
you have to look up a lot of obscure little words that will impress the
Pulitzer Prize committee with your knowledge of obscure little words. Here are
some examples that E. Annie scattered around in her book: Ruvid, plangent,
nacre, vetrid, thunge, drenty, sadiron, pelm, caliginous, strigil, and ichor.
That’s just for starters. You need lots more than that.
Next
you have to persuade your readers to suspend disbelief. There are those of us
cynics who find it very hard to believe that the main character, a non-swimmer,
learned to swim in 15 seconds after his dinghy capsized in the remote freezing
waters of Newfoundland and was rescued six hours later by his boss who just
happened to be out fishing in his own skiff.
Equally,
it would be hard to persuade us that another man, who was drowned, found,
declared dead, and later placed in his coffin for the wake, woke up when his
wife accidently stuck him with a pin, started coughing up water and came back
to life.
And
then there was the man who had a farewell party that got so out of hand that a
mob of his drunken friends took axes to his seagoing yacht in the harbor and
actually sank it — and he didn’t mind. Didn’t mind. I ask you.
Furthermore,
there’s this thing about knots that goes through the whole book. I have to
admit that I believe Turk’s Heads bring good luck, but I simply can’t swallow
the notion that knotted strings can cast witching spells, influence events, and
foment bad occurrences.
So
how you make your readers believe these things — or, at least not mind being
told such big fibs? Well, it seems that you have to bombard them with facts.
E.
Annie obviously did extensive research into Newfoundland fisheries,
boatbuilding, weather, weak jokes, and the staggering incidence of incest and
sexual assault in the region. And she never leaves out a fact she researched.
Line after line of facts, real facts, whether they have anything to do with the
plot or not. Well researched facts are plainly the things that earn Brownie
points for pusillanimous Pulitzer wannabees. They cover up the pusillanimity,
if you see what I mean. As far as the author is concerned, such lists of boring
facts may well be no more than corroborative detail, intended to lend artistic verisimilitude
to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative (as Mr. Gilbert put it) but
they do serve very well the task of pulling the wool over the eyes of the
Pulitzer prize committee, and I commend this strategy to you.
But wait. There is
more. If you are writing a love story, as this is, you must be careful not to
make your main characters too lovable. I presume the Pulitzer people must have
become too jaded after reading so many love stories about curvaceous blonde
bombshells and handsome, dashing, muscle men. E. Annie must have known this
because she was careful to describe her hero (um, well, main character, anyway)
as fat and disheveled, with a hideous prognathous jaw — a man, moreover, of
“cringing hesitancy.” And who was attracted to this timid tub of lard? A
middle-aged woman with calloused hands, gray, mended dresses, and “taut thighs
like Chinese bridges.” Holy cow. Chinese bridges?
Finally, here’s a hot
tip from E. Annie: learn to write shorthand, diary style, in between the long
lists of facts and lengthy paragraphs of dialogue. Leave out verbs and other
important words, and let your readers make up their own sentences. Here’s what
I mean:
“Saw her. The tall
woman in the green slicker. Marching along ... A calm almost handsome face,
ruddy hair ... Looked right at him.”
Well, that’s the most
of it. That’s how you write a Pulitzer winner. There’s only one more thing. You
also need to be a genius like Ms. Proulx. You have to understand human nature
and the subtle relationships between people; and you need the skill to convey
their emotions to your readers, especially the PP committee members who are
struggling to see through the wool.
I’ll never win a
Pulitzer prize, that’s quite certain, but there may be some of you out there
who will benefit from the advice here, and that is sufficient reward for me. I
wish you the best of luck.
Today’s Thought
Excellence is the perfect excuse. Do it well, and it little
matters what.
— R. W. Emerson
Tailpiece
“What’s
that mark on your nose?”
“It’s
from my glasses.”
“Why
don’t you try contacts?”
“They
don’t hold enough beer.”